TY - GEN
T1 - Pattern identification in pareto-set approximations
AU - Ulrich, Tamara
AU - Brockhoff, Dimo
AU - Zitzler, Eckart
PY - 2008/1/1
Y1 - 2008/1/1
N2 - In a multiobjective setting, evolutionary algorithms can be used to generate a set of compromise solutions. This makes decision making easier for the user as he has alternative solutions at hand which he can directly compare. However, if the number of solutions and the number of decision variables which define the solutions are large, such an analysis may be difficult and corresponding tools are desirable to support a human in separating relevant from irrelevant information. In this paper, we present a method to extract structural information from Pareto-set approximations which offers the possibility to present and visualize the trade-off surface in a compressed form. The main idea is to identify modules of decision variables that are strongly related to each other. Thereby, the set of decision variables can be reduced to a smaller number of significant modules. Furthermore, at the same time the solutions are grouped in a hierarchical manner according to their module similarity. Overall, the output is a dendrogram where the leaves are the solutions and the nodes are annotated with modules. As will be shown on knapsack problem instances and a network processor design application, this method can be highly useful to reveal hidden structures in compromise solution sets.
AB - In a multiobjective setting, evolutionary algorithms can be used to generate a set of compromise solutions. This makes decision making easier for the user as he has alternative solutions at hand which he can directly compare. However, if the number of solutions and the number of decision variables which define the solutions are large, such an analysis may be difficult and corresponding tools are desirable to support a human in separating relevant from irrelevant information. In this paper, we present a method to extract structural information from Pareto-set approximations which offers the possibility to present and visualize the trade-off surface in a compressed form. The main idea is to identify modules of decision variables that are strongly related to each other. Thereby, the set of decision variables can be reduced to a smaller number of significant modules. Furthermore, at the same time the solutions are grouped in a hierarchical manner according to their module similarity. Overall, the output is a dendrogram where the leaves are the solutions and the nodes are annotated with modules. As will be shown on knapsack problem instances and a network processor design application, this method can be highly useful to reveal hidden structures in compromise solution sets.
KW - Decision making
KW - Heuristics
KW - Multi-objective optimization
KW - Representations
U2 - 10.1145/1389095.1389236
DO - 10.1145/1389095.1389236
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:57349170166
SN - 9781605581309
T3 - GECCO'08: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation 2008
SP - 737
EP - 744
BT - GECCO'08
PB - Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
T2 - 10th Annual Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2008
Y2 - 12 July 2008 through 16 July 2008
ER -