TY - JOUR
T1 - Prone-Positioning for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
AU - Petit, Matthieu
AU - Fetita, Catalin
AU - Gaudemer, Augustin
AU - Treluyer, Ludovic
AU - Lebreton, Guillaume
AU - Franchineau, Guillaume
AU - Hekimian, Guillaume
AU - Chommeloux, Juliette
AU - de Chambrun, Marc Pineton
AU - Brechot, Nicolas
AU - Luyt, Charles Edouard
AU - Combes, Alain
AU - Schmidt, Matthieu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2022/2/1
Y1 - 2022/2/1
N2 - OBJECTIVES: To determine the characteristics and outcomes of patients prone-positioned during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and lung CT pattern associated with improved respiratory system static compliance after that intervention. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center study over 8 years. SETTINGS: Twenty-six bed ICU in a tertiary center. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A propensity score–matched analysis compared patients with prone-positioning during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and those without. An increase of the static compliance greater than or equal to3mL/cm H2O after 16 hours of prone-positioning defined prone-positioning responders. The primary outcome was the time to successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning within 90 days of postextracorporeal membrane oxygenation start, with death as a competing risk. Among 298 venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation–treated adults with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, 64 were prone-positioning extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Although both propensity score–matched groups had similar extracorporeal membrane oxygenation durations, prone-positioning extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients’ 90-day probability of being weaned-off extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and alive was higher (0.75 vs 0.54, p = 0.03; subdistribution hazard ratio [95% CI], 1.54 [1.05–2.58]) and 90-day mortality was lower (20% vs 42%, p < 0.01) than that for no prone-positioning extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation–related complications were comparable for the two groups. Patients without improved static compliance had higher percentages of nonaerated or poorly aerated ventral and medial-ventral lung regions (p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Prone-positioning during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was safe and effective and was associated with a higher probability of surviving and being weaned-off extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 90 days. Patients with greater normally aerated lung tissue in the ventral and medial-ventral regions on quantitative lung CT-scan performed before prone-positioning are more likely to improve their static compliance after that procedure during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
AB - OBJECTIVES: To determine the characteristics and outcomes of patients prone-positioned during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome and lung CT pattern associated with improved respiratory system static compliance after that intervention. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center study over 8 years. SETTINGS: Twenty-six bed ICU in a tertiary center. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A propensity score–matched analysis compared patients with prone-positioning during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and those without. An increase of the static compliance greater than or equal to3mL/cm H2O after 16 hours of prone-positioning defined prone-positioning responders. The primary outcome was the time to successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning within 90 days of postextracorporeal membrane oxygenation start, with death as a competing risk. Among 298 venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation–treated adults with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, 64 were prone-positioning extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Although both propensity score–matched groups had similar extracorporeal membrane oxygenation durations, prone-positioning extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients’ 90-day probability of being weaned-off extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and alive was higher (0.75 vs 0.54, p = 0.03; subdistribution hazard ratio [95% CI], 1.54 [1.05–2.58]) and 90-day mortality was lower (20% vs 42%, p < 0.01) than that for no prone-positioning extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation–related complications were comparable for the two groups. Patients without improved static compliance had higher percentages of nonaerated or poorly aerated ventral and medial-ventral lung regions (p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Prone-positioning during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was safe and effective and was associated with a higher probability of surviving and being weaned-off extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 90 days. Patients with greater normally aerated lung tissue in the ventral and medial-ventral regions on quantitative lung CT-scan performed before prone-positioning are more likely to improve their static compliance after that procedure during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
KW - Acute respiratory distress syndrome
KW - Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
KW - Lung tomography
KW - Outcome
KW - Prone-positioning
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85122434252
U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005145
DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005145
M3 - Article
C2 - 34259655
AN - SCOPUS:85122434252
SN - 0090-3493
VL - 50
SP - 264
EP - 274
JO - Critical Care Medicine
JF - Critical Care Medicine
IS - 2
ER -