TY - GEN
T1 - PROVABLE CONVERGENCE AND LIMITATIONS OF GEOMETRIC TEMPERING FOR LANGEVIN DYNAMICS
AU - Chehab, Omar
AU - Korba, Anna
AU - Stromme, Austin
AU - Vacher, Adrien
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 13th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - Geometric tempering is a popular approach to sampling from challenging multimodal probability distributions by instead sampling from a sequence of distributions which interpolate, using the geometric mean, between an easier proposal distribution and the target distribution. In this paper, we theoretically investigate the soundness of this approach when the sampling algorithm is Langevin dynamics, proving both upper and lower bounds. Our upper bounds are the first analysis in the literature under functional inequalities. They assert the convergence of tempered Langevin in continuous and discrete-time, and their minimization leads to closed-form optimal tempering schedules for some pairs of proposal and target distributions. Our lower bounds demonstrate a simple case where the geometric tempering takes exponential time, and further reveal that the geometric tempering can suffer from poor functional inequalities and slow convergence, even when the target distribution is well-conditioned. Overall, our results indicate that geometric tempering may not help, and can even be harmful for convergence.
AB - Geometric tempering is a popular approach to sampling from challenging multimodal probability distributions by instead sampling from a sequence of distributions which interpolate, using the geometric mean, between an easier proposal distribution and the target distribution. In this paper, we theoretically investigate the soundness of this approach when the sampling algorithm is Langevin dynamics, proving both upper and lower bounds. Our upper bounds are the first analysis in the literature under functional inequalities. They assert the convergence of tempered Langevin in continuous and discrete-time, and their minimization leads to closed-form optimal tempering schedules for some pairs of proposal and target distributions. Our lower bounds demonstrate a simple case where the geometric tempering takes exponential time, and further reveal that the geometric tempering can suffer from poor functional inequalities and slow convergence, even when the target distribution is well-conditioned. Overall, our results indicate that geometric tempering may not help, and can even be harmful for convergence.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105010215541
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105010215541
T3 - 13th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025
SP - 30515
EP - 30557
BT - 13th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025
PB - International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR
T2 - 13th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025
Y2 - 24 April 2025 through 28 April 2025
ER -