Résumé
In the preceding comment [A. Albrecht et al., Phys. Rev. E 94, 067001 (2016)10.1103/PhysRevE.94.067001], Albrecht et al. argue that important biomechanical ingredients are missing in our model about the wind speed at which trees break [Phys. Rev. E 93, 023001 (2016)10.1103/PhysRevE.93.023001]. Here we wish to emphasize that our model is an idealization, which primarily aims at evidencing the dominant ingredients of the problem. Since it captures both observed trends and orders of magnitude, we believe that the essential parameters in tree breakage have been identified, a useful step to make further progress and more detailed descriptions.
| langue originale | Anglais |
|---|---|
| Numéro d'article | 067002 |
| journal | Physical Review E |
| Volume | 94 |
| Numéro de publication | 6 |
| Les DOIs | |
| état | Publié - 13 déc. 2016 |
Empreinte digitale
Examiner les sujets de recherche de « Reply to "comment on 'Critical wind speed at which trees break' " ». Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte digitale unique.Contient cette citation
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver