Résumé
Scientific research is growingly increasingly reliant on "microwork" or "crowdsourcing" provided by digital platforms to collect new data. Digital platforms connect clients and workers, charging a fee for an algorithmically managed workflow based on Terms of Service agreements. Although these platforms offer a way to make a living or complement other sources of income, microworkers lack fundamental labor rights and basic safe working conditions, especially in the Global South. We ask how researchers and research institutions address the ethical issues involved in considering microworkers as "human participants." We argue that current scientific research fails to treat microworkers in the same way as in-person human participants, producing de facto a double morality: one applied to people with rights acknowledged by states and international bodies (e.g., the Helsinki Declaration), the other to guest workers of digital autocracies who have almost no rights at all. We illustrate our argument by drawing on 57 interviews conducted with microworkers in Spanish-speaking countries.
| langue originale | Anglais |
|---|---|
| Numéro d'article | 17 |
| journal | Science and Engineering Ethics |
| Volume | 29 |
| Numéro de publication | 3 |
| Les DOIs | |
| état | Publié - 1 juin 2023 |
SDG des Nations Unies
Ce résultat contribue à ou aux Objectifs de développement durable suivants
-
SDG 3 Bonne santé et bien-être
-
SDG 8 Travail décent et croissance économique
Empreinte digitale
Examiner les sujets de recherche de « Research Ethics in the Age of Digital Platforms ». Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte digitale unique.Contient cette citation
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver