Passer à la navigation principale Passer à la recherche Passer au contenu principal

Review of the second charged-particle transport coefficient code comparison workshop

  • Lucas J. Stanek
  • , Alina Kononov
  • , Stephanie B. Hansen
  • , Brian M. Haines
  • , S. X. Hu
  • , Patrick F. Knapp
  • , Michael S. Murillo
  • , Liam G. Stanton
  • , Heather D. Whitley
  • , Scott D. Baalrud
  • , Lucas J. Babati
  • , Andrew D. Baczewski
  • , Mandy Bethkenhagen
  • , Augustin Blanchet
  • , Raymond C. Clay
  • , Kyle R. Cochrane
  • , Lee A. Collins
  • , Amanda Dumi
  • , Gerald Faussurier
  • , Martin French
  • Zachary A. Johnson, Valentin V. Karasiev, Shashikant Kumar, Meghan K. Lentz, Cody A. Melton, Katarina A. Nichols, George M. Petrov, Vanina Recoules, Ronald Redmer, Gerd Röpke, Maximilian Schörner, Nathaniel R. Shaffer, Vidushi Sharma, Luciano G. Silvestri, François Soubiran, Phanish Suryanarayana, Mikael Tacu, Joshua P. Townsend, Alexander J. White
  • Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico
  • MST-8, Los Alamos National Laboratory
  • University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser Energetics
  • Department of Computational Mathematics, Science and Engineering
  • San Jose State University
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • CEA/DAM
  • Université Paris-Saclay
  • Universität Rostock
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Naval Research Laboratory
  • College of Computing

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

Résumé

We report the results of the second charged-particle transport coefficient code comparison workshop, which was held in Livermore, California on 24-27 July 2023. This workshop gathered theoretical, computational, and experimental scientists to assess the state of computational and experimental techniques for understanding charged-particle transport coefficients relevant to high-energy-density plasma science. Data for electronic and ionic transport coefficients, namely, the direct current electrical conductivity, electron thermal conductivity, ion shear viscosity, and ion thermal conductivity were computed and compared for multiple plasma conditions. Additional comparisons were carried out for electron-ion properties such as the electron-ion equilibration time and alpha particle stopping power. Overall, 39 participants submitted calculated results from 18 independent approaches, spanning methods from parameterized semi-empirical models to time-dependent density functional theory. In the cases studied here, we find significant differences—several orders of magnitude—between approaches, particularly at lower temperatures, and smaller differences—roughly a factor of five—among first-principles models. We investigate the origins of these differences through comparisons of underlying predictions of ionic and electronic structure. The results of this workshop help to identify plasma conditions where computationally inexpensive approaches are accurate, where computationally expensive models are required, and where experimental measurements will have high impact.

langue originaleAnglais
Numéro d'article052104
journalPhysics of Plasmas
Volume31
Numéro de publication5
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 1 mai 2024

Empreinte digitale

Examiner les sujets de recherche de « Review of the second charged-particle transport coefficient code comparison workshop ». Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte digitale unique.

Contient cette citation