TY - JOUR
T1 - State of the art of gyrokinetic and hybrid MHD-kinetic codes through non-linear benchmarking to study reactor relevant burning plasmas
AU - Vlad, Gregorio
AU - Wang, Xin
AU - Vannini, Francesco
AU - Lütjens, Hinrich
AU - Briguglio, Sergio
AU - Carlevaro, Nakia
AU - Falessi, Matteo V.
AU - Fogaccia, Giuliana
AU - Fusco, Valeria
AU - Zonca, Fulvio
AU - Biancalani, Alessandro
AU - Bottino, Alberto
AU - Hayward-Schneider, Thomas
AU - Lauber, Philipp
AU - Rofman, Baruch
AU - Villard, Laurent
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/12/1
Y1 - 2025/12/1
N2 - After a brief introduction on present day simulation and modeling of burning plasmas in magnetically confined devices, the results of a non-linear benchmark are presented, undertaken among several state-of-the-art codes available to study the self-consistent interaction of an Energetic Particle (EP) population with shear Alfvén waves: HYMAGYC, MEGA, ORB5 and XTOR-K. The first two codes, HYMAGYC and MEGA, are hybrid codes: HYMAGYC is a MHD-Gyrokinetic code (the bulk plasma is represented by MHD equations, while the EP species is treated using the gyrokinetic formalism), while MEGA is an MHD-Drift-Kinetic code (the bulk plasma is represented by MHD equations, while the EP species is treated using the drift-kinetic formalism, with the possibility of an ad-hoc gyroaveraging); ORB5 is a global electromagnetic gyrokinetic code (both bulk and EP species are treated using the gyrokinetic formalism); XTOR-K is a non-linear kinetic-MHD code (the bulk plasma is described by a set of non-linear resistive two-fluid MHD equations, extended to include kinetic effects of multiple ion species with a fully kinetic PIC module). The equilibrium of the so-called NLED-AUG reference case, in its version with peaked off-axis EP density profile, has been used, while considering a |n|=1 perturbation. This non-linear benchmark is the natural continuation of the linear benchmark already considered in the recent past, and represent a first-ever code comparison in the deep non-linear stage. In the present study fluid non-linearities are omitted, and the focus will be on comparing wave-particle interactions effects across codes. Characteristics of the non-linear saturation of the mode, self-consistent modification to the EP density profile and other features are compared among the considered codes. This brief review presents the state of the art of gyrokinetic and hybrid MHD-kinetic codes emerging as tools for studying reactor-relevant burning plasmas in realistic conditions.
AB - After a brief introduction on present day simulation and modeling of burning plasmas in magnetically confined devices, the results of a non-linear benchmark are presented, undertaken among several state-of-the-art codes available to study the self-consistent interaction of an Energetic Particle (EP) population with shear Alfvén waves: HYMAGYC, MEGA, ORB5 and XTOR-K. The first two codes, HYMAGYC and MEGA, are hybrid codes: HYMAGYC is a MHD-Gyrokinetic code (the bulk plasma is represented by MHD equations, while the EP species is treated using the gyrokinetic formalism), while MEGA is an MHD-Drift-Kinetic code (the bulk plasma is represented by MHD equations, while the EP species is treated using the drift-kinetic formalism, with the possibility of an ad-hoc gyroaveraging); ORB5 is a global electromagnetic gyrokinetic code (both bulk and EP species are treated using the gyrokinetic formalism); XTOR-K is a non-linear kinetic-MHD code (the bulk plasma is described by a set of non-linear resistive two-fluid MHD equations, extended to include kinetic effects of multiple ion species with a fully kinetic PIC module). The equilibrium of the so-called NLED-AUG reference case, in its version with peaked off-axis EP density profile, has been used, while considering a |n|=1 perturbation. This non-linear benchmark is the natural continuation of the linear benchmark already considered in the recent past, and represent a first-ever code comparison in the deep non-linear stage. In the present study fluid non-linearities are omitted, and the focus will be on comparing wave-particle interactions effects across codes. Characteristics of the non-linear saturation of the mode, self-consistent modification to the EP density profile and other features are compared among the considered codes. This brief review presents the state of the art of gyrokinetic and hybrid MHD-kinetic codes emerging as tools for studying reactor-relevant burning plasmas in realistic conditions.
KW - Alfvénic modes
KW - Energetic particles
KW - Gyrokinetic simulation
KW - Hybrid MHD-gyrokinetic simulation
KW - Ideal and resistive MHD modes
KW - Kinetic-MHD simulation
KW - Non-linear simulation
KW - Numerical simulations
KW - Particle-in-cell method
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015694662
U2 - 10.1007/s41614-025-00199-2
DO - 10.1007/s41614-025-00199-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105015694662
SN - 2367-3192
VL - 9
JO - Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics
JF - Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics
IS - 1
M1 - 27
ER -